Gap Analysis

Audit-ready,
by Friday.

Auto-populate evidence from your compliance map, let AI deliver a first-pass status against every clause, and read narrative analysis that explains exactly where the gaps are. The assessment that used to be a quarter is a sprint.

app.qformance.io / gap-analysis / GAP-2026-ISO9001
GAP-2026-001ISO 9001:201592% reviewed · 7 gaps · 14 partial
Section 4–5 · 7 of 47 requirements
4.1Understanding the organization and its contextCompliant3 evidence
4.2Needs and expectations of interested partiesPartial2 evidence
4.3Scope of the QMSCompliant5 evidence
4.4QMS and its processesCompliant8 evidence
5.1Leadership and commitmentGapno evidence
5.2Quality policyCompliant2 evidence
5.3Roles, responsibilities and authoritiesPartial1 evidence
Compliance breakdown
62%compliant
Compliant62
Partial14
Gap7
N/A4
Not reviewed13

AI does the heavy lifting.

Three capabilities turn a gap analysis from a weeks-long evidence hunt into a focused review of edge cases.

Auto-populate

A first-draft assessment in seconds.

Auto-populate reads your compliance map and instantly links the right document sections to the right requirements. What used to be a week of evidence-gathering is the assessment's starting point — done before your kick-off meeting.

Auto-populate · running
Linking from compliance map
47 requirements · scanning 218 document sections
34 / 47
7.1.5Monitoring & measuring resources3 evidenceLINKED
7.2Competence2 evidenceLINKED
7.3Awareness0 evidence...
7.4Communication1 evidenceLINKED
AI bulk first-pass

Compliant / Partial / Gap, across the whole standard.

AI reads the linked evidence and assigns a first-pass status against every clause. You review and adjust. The heavy lifting is done before your first internal assessment meeting starts.

AI bulk assessment · 47 requirements
+22 Compliant+11 Partial+7 Gap+4 N/A
AI rationale per clause · drill into any cell to see the exact evidence the model considered and the reasoning for the status it picked.
Narrative analysis

Why a gap exists, in plain English.

For any gap, AI explains what's missing, what your existing evidence covers, and what next steps would close it — drawing on the actual content of your documents, not template platitudes. You can paste it into a board pack.

Clause 7.3 · Awareness · narrative
GAP0 evidence linked · 1 partial reference found
What's missing. The clause requires evidence that personnel are aware of the quality policy, their contribution, and the implications of non-conformance. Your library covers the policy itself (DOC-POL-01), but no documented mechanism delivers awareness back to the floor.
Suggested closure. Add an awareness module to the Training course catalog, link it to DOC-POL-01, set retrain to 24 months. Cite the completion record on this requirement.

A real assessment, not a checklist.

Underneath the AI is the structure you actually need: clear statuses, multi-standard support, gap-to-action flow, evidence wherever it lives.

Five-status assessment

Compliant, Partial, Gap, N/A, Not Reviewed — every requirement gets a clear status. Roll up the percentages and you have your audit-readiness number, defensible and current.

Multi-standard

ISO 9001, AS9100D, IATF 16949, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, FDA QSR — and any standard you configure. Run one assessment per standard or look at coverage across multiple at once.

Actions raised against gaps

Spot a gap, raise an action against it inline. The action joins your unified Actions register with assignee, due date, and approval workflow — no separate gap-closure tracker.

Evidence beyond the doc library

When evidence lives outside QFormance — a contract, photo, system screenshot — upload the file or capture a note. The assessment is complete, not just the parts that were already digital.

Reporting

A number you can defend.

Compliance %, Partial %, Gap % — calculated from real status entries against real evidence, not vibes. Show it to leadership, take it to the board, walk into your audit with it. The trend curve shows you whether the program is closing or drifting.

Compliance trend · last 12 months
0%25%50%75%100%Compliant 62%Gap 7%
Reviewed
92%
Compliant
62%
Net delta · 90d
+11%

Know exactly where you stand.

Auto-populate your first assessment, run AI analysis, and have a defensible compliance number by the end of the week.