Change with proof,
not promises.
Risk-based MOC routing that decides — automatically — whether your change needs an FMEA refresh, a JHA, training, or all three. The right reviewers see it, the right artifacts get attached, the right approvals close it out.
Press 4 conveyor guard upgrade — replace mesh fence with light curtain
The routing that decides what changes.
Set the change type and risk level. The approval chain assembles itself from your routing rules — you review the answer; the system handles the choreography.
From risk level to approval chain, automatically.
Score the change against your risk matrix. The tier follows from the score, the approval chain follows from your routing rules, and the artifacts your organization requires at that risk level — an FMEA, a JHA — are enforced before it can be submitted. Configure it once; every MOC routes itself.
Three tiers, three workflows.
Tier 1 — minor, single approver, light evidence. Tier 2 — cross-functional review, FMEA refresh required. Tier 3 — safety-significant, JHA + training + multi-discipline approval. The system enforces the path; humans decide the change.
It pulls every other module along.
The hardest part of a change isn't approving it. It's making sure the FMEA, the JHA, the SOP, and the people on the floor all get updated together.
PFMEA refresh
Affected rows pre-staged. Approver sees diffs, not the whole table.
JHA update
Hazards re-scored against the new control. Sign-off captured before close.
SOP / WI revisions
Docs branch from current → revised. Approval cascades into acknowledgement prompts.
Training prompts
Affected operators get prompts in their Hub. Closure waits for acknowledgement.
The right reviewers, in the right order.
Configure parallel approvals where reviews can run concurrently (Quality + Safety + Ops simultaneously) or serial chains where one decision unlocks the next. Delegations carry context. Reviewers see the diffs that affect them, not the whole pile.
No closure without residual evidence.
An MOC can't close until residual risk is verified — refreshed FMEA approved, JHA signed, training acknowledged, SOPs at the new revision, and any commissioning evidence attached. The system blocks closure with a specific list of what's outstanding, every time.
An MOC program that defends itself.
Numbers leadership and auditors actually believe — because they're calculated from the structured pipeline, not pulled from a spreadsheet.
Cycle time by tier
Median days from open to closure, broken down by tier. Spot the bottleneck — is it triage, approval, or verification?
Coverage by area
Which production lines, sites, or product families have the highest change activity. Use it to plan audit scope and risk reviews.
Residual-risk delta
Average risk reduction per tier 3 change. Make the case for the next investment with hard numbers — not the post-incident retrospective.
Change with proof, not promises.
Risk-based MOC, with the FMEA refresh, the JHA, and the training prompts wired in — exactly where you need them.